Children's Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) Three Years after Implementation of Treatment Protocols for Managing Cavitated Carious Dentine Lesions.

PURPOSE: To assess children's oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) three years after implementation of three treatment protocols for managing cavitated carious dentine lesions in primary molars by parent proxy report with the Brazilian Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (B-ECOHIS) and to assess the level of agreement between the children's self-reporting and the parents' reporting of the children's OHRQoL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Schoolchildren aged 6 to 7 were included in a clinical trial that compared three treatment protocols for managing cavitated carious dentine lesions: CRT (Conventional Treatment); ART (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment) and UCT (Ultraconservative Treatment). Before treatment (baseline), the OHRQoL of 273 children was assessed by B-ECOHIS using the parents'/caregivers' proxy report. Three years later, 147 parents/caregivers filled in the questionnaire while the children, ages 9 to 10, were interviewed. The t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: No difference was observed between treatment protocols in regard to the children's OHRQoL (p = 0.41). A significant reduction in the parent distress domain was observed when baseline and parents'/caretakers' responses after three years (p = 0.01) were compared. The level of agreement between the parents'/caregivers' and children's scores was low. Children scored lower on the impact of oral health on their quality of life than their parents/caregivers did (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of UCT, a largely non-restorative protocol, leads to a perception of OHRQoL by parents/caregivers that is similar to the ART and CRT protocols after three years. Parent distress decreased over time. Children and parents/caregivers disagreed about children's OHRQoL.

Are Clinically Successful Amalgam and ART Restorations in Primary Molars Microgap Free?

PURPOSE: To determine whether the frequency of microleakage at the margin of the tooth-restoration interface in primary molars restored with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) differs from that of primary molars restored with amalgam. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HVGIC restorations were performed according to the ART method. A total of 19 naturally exfoliated primary molars (10 amalgam and 9 ART/HVGIC) with clinically assessed intact restorations fulfilled the inclusion criteria. SEM analyses using replicas were performed to assess the microgap presence and size of the tooth-restoration interface The depth of a microgap was measured from histological sections after infiltration of 50% (w/v) AgNO3 solution. Independent variables were restorative material, age of restoration, and number of tooth surfaces. Data analyses included Fisher's Exact version of the chi-squared test, independent t-test and one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: More ART/HVGIC than amalgam-restored teeth were gap free (p = 0.14). The mean gap size for teeth with a gap between amalgam (322.0 µm) and ART/HVGIC (201.0 µm) restorations did not differ statistically significantly. AgNO3 infiltration was not influenced by restorative material or age of restoration. Infiltration in multiple-surface was higher than in single-surface restorations (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of marginal microleakage in primary molars restored by ART/HVGIC is no different from that observed in primary molars restored with amalgam. Microleakage was deeper in multiple-surface than in single-surface restorations. Despite the presence of microleakage, restoration functionality up to exfoliation is secured, reinforcing the importance of biofilm removal and behavioral education of patients.

Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Dentine Mineral Concentration in Primary Molars Managed by Three Treatment Protocols.

The objectives of the study were to quantify the dentine mineral concentration (DMC) in teeth restored conventionally, according to the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and ultraconservative (UCT) protocols (open cavities and small ART restorations), and the DMC underneath the open cavities of teeth managed by UCT versus nontreated, open cavities. We studied 50 teeth with restorations/open cavities, 39 restored teeth (9 by conventional restorative treatment [CRT], 17 by ART, and 13 by UCT) and 16 teeth with open cavities. Each restoration/open cavity was scanned using microcomputed tomography, with 3 hydroxyapatite disks with respective densities of 1.24, 1.33, and 1.57 g/cm3 as a reference. Images were reconstructed and the greyscale images were converted into DMC values. For each restoration/open cavity, 15 measurements of dentine immediately underneath and from the corresponding area in sound dentine were taken. DMC was expressed as a percentage of the DMC of sound dentine. ANOVA and the Student t test were used for statistical analysis. The mean DMC underneath restorations of the ART protocol group (98.93%) was statistically significantly higher than that of the UCT protocol group (91.98%), but not of the CRT protocol group (91.33%). On multiple surfaces, mean DMC in the axial area (94.32%) was statistically significantly higher than in the gingival area (92.80%). The mean DMC of open cavities managed by UCT protocol (89.05%) was statistically significantly higher than in nontreated open cavities (83.90%). In conclusion, a dentine-hypermineralized area underneath ART restorations was observed. Managing open cavities with a toothbrush and fluoride toothpaste (the UCT protocol) resulted in higher mineralized dentine underneath the cavity than in nontreated open cavities.